Damn, I'm glad you liberal types are funny, cause if it wasn't kinda silly I might think that apple brown-betty crack was not only stupid but a bit offensive to boot. Hee hee, three kids means you breed like rabits, you're so funny.

First off, genius, she has five kids, not three. I don't care how many kids someone wants to have, but if you're liberal-baiting 'round these parts, you might want to come in with your facts straight. Five children is significantly above average for a U.S. household, so breeding like rabbits doesn't seem unfair.

Plus it's not just the five kids she has. When one of her five spawn starts spawning before crawling out of the nest, that tends to indicate the breeding habits (and intellect) of a lower mammal.

I take the apple-brown betty comment to be a satirical observation about a "family values" candidate who (a) favors abstinence lectures over family planning education and (b) is offered up exclusively because her party is so out of touch with women's political concerns that they think offering up the least qualified VP candidate in major party history is excusable because, hey bitches, we're putting a woman out there. The fact that she's an absolute slap in the face to the values of most independent women voters has nothing to do with it!

I vote for Heidi. Or Paris. Either or and I'm good. But let's not tell, Spence, K'? He's a bit of a hater...

Sheesh. McCain's making a mockery of the campaign, so why not embrace it? Doesn't realize that with Palin hanging around, he just killed any chance that he'll get away with a bit of naughty-naughty with the white house aids? I mean, that is the point, isn't it?

First of all, defensive much? My intent was not to "liberal bait" anyone. I was simply calling out the writer of the comments for so blatently playing the democratic card under the guiles of satire. I mean shit, I GET IT. The world of internet media and bloggers are a bunch of card carrying, tree hugging, liberal democrats who will follow the party regardless of their lack of insight or intelligence, much like the sheep followers of the republican party they hate so much. I don't care. I am an independant thinker and voter and I look down on both parties for their childishly hypocritcal side taking and the "my way or the highway" attitude that has stagnated our government from the local to the regional to the federal levels. She no more slaps me in the face than any other candidate I have seen in this election. I mean come on, how closed minded do you have to be to degrade the woman, not for her f---ed up politics, but for her family situation and her lack of experience in our federal government. Hello, Obama who? I thought it was change you wanted not more of the status quo. And until she's living in section 8 housing and eating off food stamps, how many children she has is none of your damn business. And the fact that you focused on a minute number that made no difference to the sentiment of my comment shows I'm not the only "genius" in this conversation, I'm just the least defensive one.

And until she's living in section 8 housing and eating off food stamps, how many children she has is none of your damn business.

Wrong again. When someone has the power to get us into a war or appoint Supreme Court justices who will restrict my civil rights or sign laws about child care and parental rights, I have every right to know everything there is to know about that person. Wear your blinders if you want, but the candidate's personal choices for her own life and family reflect her true philosophy and beliefs a lot more than anything she says in some speech prepared for her by other people. Her beliefs about her personal life are clearly relevant. She chose to put her family in the crucible, and now she has to live with that.

I'm just the least defensive one.

Which is why you responded with a semi-literate, run-on paragraph worthy of Miley Cyrus's MySpace page. Keep saying it, maybe you'll even believe it.